[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [linrad] RE:New Linrad e-mail list user



That should be

chmod a+rw /dev/dsp*

Sorry for the typo

Bob


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Robert McGwier
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 14:05
To: linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [linrad] RE:New Linrad e-mail list user


Please do

ls -l  /dev/dsp*

and return to us the results.  You might
also try

chmod a+rw /dev/dsp&

while logged in as root.

If you are already logged in as root, please forget this
email.

Bob
N4HY


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Ramiro Aceves,
EA1ABZ
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:57
To: linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [linrad] RE:New Linrad e-mail list user


Leif Åsbrink wrote:

SNIP

Paraphrase: You are happy but want second card to work



My sound card is a classic Sound Blaster 16 and 24 MB RAM 486

Any sugerences?
Many thanks for your help.




> Hello Ramiro,
>
>
>>I have installed the following Linrad versions:
>>00-35
>>00-56
>>01-03
>>and I can not make any of them work properly in the 486. When I press left
>>mouse button on the waterfall graph to listen to the signal, the
>>sound works
>>some seconds, then stops and come back later, and so on.... I do not know
>>what happened cause I got it working two years ago. I get delay
>>times longer
>>than 20 seconds. In the past I get shorter delay times and better computer
>>response (now it is too slow). I think I need to study Linrad manual in
>>order to understand it better and weak the parameters properly. I do not
>>remember what parameters I used, perhaps you keep our old
>>e-mails? I deleted them. :-)
>
> Yes, I keep old E-mails to some extent and I found a report from
> you specifying the following par_userint file:
> vga mode [11]
> font scale [1]
> mouse speed [64]
> input mode [0]
> rx channels [1]
> ad channels [1]
> ad speed [6000]
> ad device no [32]
> ad device mode [0]
> ad frag [8]
> da device no [33]
> min da speed [5000]
> max da speed [44100]
> max da channels [2]
> max da bytes [2]
> min da channels [1]
> min da bytes [1]
> check [2220024]
>
>
>
> These were the par_wcw parameters:
> First FFT bandwidth (Hz) [15]
> First FFT window (power of sin) [1]
> First forward FFT version [3]
> First FFT storage time (s) [4]
> First FFT amplitude [1000]
> Enable second FFT [0]
> First backward FFT version [0]
> First backward FFT att. N [5]
> Second FFT bandwidth factor in powers of 2 [2]
> Second FFT window (power of sin) [0]
> Second forward FFT version [0]
> Second forward FFT att. N [7]
> Second FFT storage time (s) [5]
> Enable AFC [0]
> AFC averaging time (s) [5]
> AFC delay (%) [25]
> AFC min S/N (dB) [6]
> AFC lock range Hz [150]
> AFC max drift Hz/minute [100]
> First mixer bandwidth reduction in powers of 2 [4]
> First mixer no of channels [1]
> Baseband storage time (s) [200]
> Output delay margin (0.1sek) [5]
> Output sampling speed (Hz) [6000]
> Default output mode [0]
> A/D speed [6000]
> Check [1110024]
>
> The parameter file changes a little from version to version
> but I think the above sholud make it easy to restore the
> performance you had Sept 14 2001, at least with 00-35.
> In case more recent versions run slower or behave incorrectly
> on your 486 I would be very interested to know.
>
>
> 73
>
> Leif / SM5BSZ
>
>
>
>







LINRADDARNIL
i