[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[linrad] Re: [Winrad] W3CCX/B Linrad and Winrad



Leif:

Thank you very much for this note. I have been holding off on releasing my version of your blanker because I thought it had problems. It may still but at least you and I get the same results on the IK3MAC I/Q recording that allowed us to know we had a very good "traditional" blanker as well as a signal dependent smoother. Alberto is using the blanker that I also use in DttSP and PowerSDR. I thought there was some problem with my version of your code.

Thank you for all your wonderful work in Linrad.

Bob
N4HY



leif@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi All,

The recording made by Roger, W3SZ, with a weak signal from
W3CCX/B in the presence of some impulse noise interference
contains pulse trains that can not be resolved at the
bandwidth of the recording. The smart blanker of Linrad
is therefore not helpful and noise blanking is essentially
achieved with the dumb blanker.

Linrad and Winrad perform very similarly on this recording,
I have placed a comparison as well as all the files here:
http://www.sm5bsz.com/w3sz/weakccs/winlin.htm

73

Leif / SM5BSZ



--
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
Laziness is the number one inspiration for ingenuity.  Guilty as charged!


#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list <linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <linrad-off@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <linrad-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <linrad-index@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Send administrative queries to  <linrad-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

LINRADDARNIL