[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Linrad] Re: LINRAD and SDR IQ
- Subject: [Linrad] Re: LINRAD and SDR IQ
- From: Leif Asbrink <sm5bsz.com; leif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 17:42:47 +0100
> > With respect to the SDR-14 there should be no differences although
> > you might find that Windows does not allow quite as high data rate on
> > the USB as Linux does.
> Hmmmm, I don't want to look as a defender of Windows against the reality,
> but in my opinion there are many, too many, myths about the relative qualities
> of Linux and Windows.
My observation of slower speed is for SDR-14 (and SDR-IQ) - not
for Windows itself. The dll used under Windows is different from
the device driver used under Linux. That may well be the explanation.
The observation I made is that SDR-14 can be used at a sampling rates
up to 231 kHz under Linux on a PentiumIV while rhe maximum rate on
the same computer under Windows is 190 kHz. Look here:
> The QS1r of Phil Covington is able to pump 4 MB/sec
> through the USB port, and this under Windows.... Perseus does the same
> at 2 MB/sec, so if a limit exists with the SDR-IQ, it is surely not fault of
> Windows itself...
But Perseus and QS1R use USB 2.x !!!
The SDR-IQ and SDR-14 use USB 1.1 The nominal maximum USB speed
is 635 Kbytes/s continous data. That is no more than 160 kHz.
Windows is faster than expected, but Linux is much faster. The reason could
be the quality of drive routines but as a normal user one tends to see them
as parts of the operating system.....
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Linrad" group.
To post to this group, send email to linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to linrad+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/linrad?hl=en