[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Linrad] Re: Linrad and MAP65-IQ Calibration
- Subject: [Linrad] Re: Linrad and MAP65-IQ Calibration
- From: Leif Asbrink <sm5bsz.com; leif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:24:24 +0200
> I would like to understand this properly before I start making
> If I have understood you correctly, I first need to set
> in sdrdef.h (and recompile) to correct the Linrad reading.
There is another option. You may use SpectraVue to change
the contents of the non-volatile RAM inside the SDR-IQ.
I never did that and I do not know what effects it would
have, but most likely it would be equivalent to change
> Then I need to set Fcal in MAP-65-IQ to bring that into line.
> Is this correct?
I actually do not know the details of MAP-65, but once
Linrad shows the frequency correctly any frequency shift
must be taken care of inside MAP65-IQ. There is Fcal and
Fadd. Presumably you could also adjust Fadd.
> If this is the right approach, then may I request that the next
> version of Linrad
> brings the sampling clock frequency out into the setup in some form,
> perhaps just as correction of up to +/-1000Hz if that is enough.
> Recompiling is ok, but it needs to be done for every new version of
> and there are lots of SDR-IQ users out there who would not wish to do
> but who would like to correct this sampling frequency error.
Try to run the SpectraVue calibration. In case it makes the
SDR-IQ behave as if the sampling speed were exactly 66.6666666 MHz
and thus makes both SpectraVue and Linrad correctly calibrated
it would be better to leave caligration outside Linrad.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Linrad" group.
To post to this group, send email to linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to linrad+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/linrad?hl=en